Scope of CITRAP
Counter-Insider Threat Research and Practice (CITRAP) is an online, unclassified, open-access, peer-reviewed journal. The journal aims to reach professionals in both research and operational communities who seek to address the insider threat risk—the risk that a person who is trusted by an organization will intentionally or unintentionally act in a way that harms others, the organization, or its assets. CITRAP is an interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary resource for scholarly works that reports on findings and lessons learned across a broad spectrum of the research and operational communities. These communities include the computational sciences, behavioral sciences, public policy, law enforcement, and industry.
Championing multi-disciplinary social-behavioral science (SBS) research, CITRAP communicates practical and theoretical advances in all aspects of insider threat research and practice. It facilitates the translation of SBS insider threat research into evidence-based practice, with an emphasis on comprehensive approaches to counter insider threats through individual and organizational wellness, protection, and health. CITRAP is published by The Threat Lab in partnership with the Department of Defense (DoD) Counter-Insider Threat Program and the National Insider Threat Task Force (NITTF). Opinions expressed in this journal are solely those of the authors and do not reflect the positions or policies of the DoD, NITTF, or The Threat Lab.
Editorial Board
Acting Editor-in-Chief
David Richmond, The Threat Lab, PERSEREC
Associate Editors
William R. Claycomb, CERT Division, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University
Deborah Loftis, Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Christine Noonan, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Matthew Schumacher, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department
Administrative Staff
Michael Hunter, Peraton, Inc.
Reviewer Acknowledgments
A peer-reviewed journal is dependent on the generous time and insightful comments of peer reviewers. The final decisions are greatly facilitated by recommendations of peer reviewers who bring deeper technical knowledge, scientific insights, or broader understanding of the possible contributions and impacts of prospective manuscripts. Efforts of peer reviewers often go unrecognized: The editors and staff of CITRAP would like to publicly acknowledge and thank the following individuals who provided peer reviews this year.
Peer-Reviewers
Nicole Alford, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Matt Allen, University of Nebraska, Omaha
Seth Bridges, U.S. National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
Liza Briggs, U.S. Marine Corps
Catherine Camilletti, U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Deanna Caputo, MITRE
Claudia Cespedes, U.S. National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
Jason Clark, Embry Riddle University
Bill Conklin, U.S. Department of Energy
Paul Corbitt, Elder Research Inc.
Margaret Cunningham, Robinhood
Orlandrew Danzell, James Madison University
Cory Davenport, U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Shawnee Delaney, Vaillance Group
Mark Handy, Morgan Stanley
Christopher Hobbs, King’s College, London
Michael Hudson, ClearForce
Daniel Jones, University of Nevada–Reno
Kirk Kennedy, Peraton, Inc.
Mark F. Lenzenweger, The State University of New York at Binghamton
JT Mendoza, Industry
Andrew Moore, Carnegie Mellon University
David Morrison, U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Adrian Murray, U.S. Department of Energy
Christopher Myers, U.S. National Geospatial Intelligence Agency
Elsine van Os, Signpost Six
Katherine Pherson, Pherson Associates
Robert Pittman, California State University–Dominguez Hills
Justin Purl, Google
Review Committee, National Insider Threat Task Force
Viveca Saffer, U.S. Department of Defense
Eric Shaw, Insider Risk Group, LLC
Steve Sin, University of Maryland–College Park
Christopher M Spirito, Idaho National Laboratory
Doug Thomas, JP Morgan Chase
Jamila Williams, U.S. Department of Defense
Christina Winters, Tilburg University